Dynamic signal quality index for electrocardiograms

Our new website is in development. Try it out at: https://alpha.physionet.org and give us feedback

When referencing this material, please cite the following publication:

Negin Yaghmaie, Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali, Herbert F Jelinek and Faezeh Mazrbanrad. Dynamic signal quality index for electrocardiograms. Physiol Meas. 2018 Oct 22;39(10):105008. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aadf02.

In addition, please include the standard PhysioNet citation:

Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PCh, Mark RG, Mietus JE, Moody GB, Peng C-K, Stanley HE. "PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals," Circulation 101(23):e215-e220 [Circulation Electronic Pages; http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/23/e215.full]; 2000 (June 13).

Background

The advent of telehealth applications and remote patient monitoring has led to an increasing need for continuous signal quality monitoring to ensure high diagnostic accuracy of the recordings. Cardiovascular diseases often manifest electrophysiological anomalies, therefore the electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most used signals for diagnostic applications. Various types of noise and artifacts are not uncommon in ECG recordings and assessing the quality of the signal is essential prior to any clinical interpretation. In this study, a dynamic signal quality index (dSQI) is introduced using a new time-frequency template-based approach.

Software Description

A smoothed pseudo Wigner–Ville transform is applied to derive the time-frequency patterns of the ECG signal. A weighted cross correlation function then assigns a score between 0 to 1 to each identified ECG beat to indicate the signal quality. It evaluates the consistency of the patterns over an ECG window of multiple beats. To assess the performance of the dSQI, the algorithm was tested with the public databases on PhysioNet, alongside other state-of-the-art indexes for comparison. The recordings were classified into noisy and normal recordings, as well as noisy data versus the recordings from patients with heart diseases and abnormal rhythms. Main results: The results showed that dSQI outperformed previous metrics when used individually with an area under curve (AUC) of 93.18% for normal versus noisy and 93.69% for abnormal versus noisy. A support vector machine was also trained with different combinations of dSQI and other signal quality indexes, where dSQI showed to be among the best performing sets in classifying both normal versus noisy (97.4% on training set and 96.9% on test set) and abnormal versus noisy (97.6% on training set and 96.3% on test set). The method was also tested on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database to evaluate dSQI in common arrhythmia cases. Significance: The results indicate that dSQI provides a more accurate and continuous scalar metric for beat-by-beat ECG quality assessment, even for those with arrhythmia.

The code is written in Matlab.

Authors

Negin Yaghmaie, Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali, Herbert F Jelinek, and Faezeh Mazrbanrad.

Icon  Name                    Last modified      Size  Description
[DIR] Parent Directory - [   ] DSQI.zip 12-Nov-2018 16:19 16K [TXT] dsqi.m 12-Nov-2018 16:19 4.7K [DIR] subfunctions/ 12-Nov-2018 16:19 -

Questions and Comments

If you would like help understanding, using, or downloading content, please see our Frequently Asked Questions.

If you have any comments, feedback, or particular questions regarding this page, please send them to the webmaster.

Comments and issues can also be raised on PhysioNet's GitHub page.

Updated Friday, 28 October 2016 at 18:58 BRST

PhysioNet is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) under NIH grant number 2R01GM104987-09.